This is the eternal debate and I've been on both sides of it over the years so I figured I'd share my experience and let the forum fight it out.
We bought our house in 2003 with a 30-year fixed at 5.75%. By 2010 we'd refinanced to 3.5%. At that point the math was clear -- the market was returning 10%+ and our mortgage was 3.5%. Every extra dollar we put into VTI instead of the mortgage was earning roughly 6.5% more than the guaranteed "return" from paying down the mortgage.
So we invested every extra penny instead of paying the mortgage early. By 2022 when we finally paid off the house (sold our old one, bought a smaller place in FL with cash), the invested money had more than covered the remaining mortgage balance plus we had a nice chunk left over.
BUT -- and this is important -- the math only worked because we actually invested the difference. If we'd just spent it, we would have been better off paying the mortgage. And there were nights in 2008 and 2020 where I questioned our sanity.
So what does the forum think? With today's rates around 6.5-7%, does the math still work? Or at these rates is paying extra on the mortgage basically a guaranteed 7% return which is hard to beat?
---
"The stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient." - Buffett
